Evolution: Fact or Fiction? Pt. 6 – How Old is the Universe?

Filed under: Debunkery,Featured,Science & Evolution |

Evolutionists generally use five different methods in determining the age of matter: salt content in the oceans, deposition of sediments, rate of soil erosion, disintegration of radioactive materials, and Libby’s Carbon 14 experiment. Problems can be found with all of these methods, but the biggest problem of all is the method that they’ve chosen to ignore–the study of Half Lives.

This is where one figures the current rate of decay or deterioration of something and then figures backwards to see how long this process has been going. For example, if one fills his gas tank up with gas and drives for 100 miles, you can figure that he’s driven 100 miles if you know how may miles his car will travel per gallon.

The dating of matter works the same way, except in science this is called the study of Half Lives. Evolutionists tend to steer away from this field of study, for it is very capable of demolishing their religious conviction that the universe and the earth is billions of years old. Let’s look at a few examples:

The sun is continuously burning out at a rate of 5 feet per hour. This means that the sun would have been TWICE the size that it is now only 100,000 years ago! Only 20,000,000 years ago, the sun would have been so large that it would be touching the earth! Yet evolutionists insist that the universe, including the sun, is billions of years old.

Because of meteors and meteorites, interplanetary dust falls upon the earth at a rate of at least 14 million tons per year. The evolutionists claim that the earth, the moon, and the various planets are at least 4.5 billion years old. This means that there should be a layer of space dust on the moon over 500 feet thick. However, when the astronauts landed on the moon, LESS THAN THREE INCHES of dust were found. Three inches could have accumulated in less than 8000 years.

Radioactive helium is generated by decaying uranium atoms. Dr. Melvin Cook, a former Nobel-prize nominee, says that this helium is constantly being released into our atmosphere, and that there are currently about a million-billion grams of this helium in our atmosphere. Yet, this is a very small number compared to what it would be if the earth were over 4.5 billion years old. According to Cook’s measurements, the earth can’t be over 10,000 to 15,000 years old.

The half life of the earth’s magnetic field is believed to be less than 1400 years. That is, 1400 years ago, the earth’s magnetic field would have been twice as strong as it is today. Only 10,000 years ago, the earth would have had a magnetic field as strong as the sun! WHO KNOWS what it would have been like 4.5 billion years ago!?

You see, these are the things that are commonly ignored by “serious scientists”. The theory of evolution is an UNSCIENTIFIC theory, which is made up of blind guesswork and outright lying. It cannot be proven by the scientific laws of observation and experimentation. Darwin’s theory is nothing more than a religious faith for high-minded people who think they’re too smart for God.

The Lord Jesus Christ was a Creationist (Matt. 19:4; Mark 13:19), and when we compare His life work to the life work of Darwin and his followers, we find a much better Way in Jesus Christ and in the written word of God.

Friend, if you’ve never received the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior, YOU still have a chance.

Here are the links to the whole “Evolution: Fact or Fiction?” Series.

Related Posts:

Posted by on December 16, 2011. Filed under Debunkery, Featured, Science & Evolution. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

10 Responses to Evolution: Fact or Fiction? Pt. 6 – How Old is the Universe?

  1. Its superb as your other blog posts : D, appreciate it for putting up.

    Tony Duk
    February 4, 2012 at 22:07
    Reply

  2. Allow me, please, to rfute, once again, why you are all to ignorant to own computers:

    1. The shrinking-sun argument contains two errors. The worst, by far, is the assumption that if the sun is shrinking today, then it has always been shrinking!

    That’s a little like watching the tide go out and concluding that the water level must have fallen at that rate since the earth began. Therefore, working backwards, much of the land must have been under water a few weeks ago! Since careful inspection shows no signs of such a flood, the earth can’t be older than a few weeks!

    2. The most amazing thing about the cosmic dust argument is that it is still being used! It has coasted along on obsolete evidence, and nothing but obsolete evidence, for the last 25 years!! It nicely illustrates how creationists borrow from each other and never do any outside reading.
    For more information, please use the science-danged computers you made this with.

    3. 4.5 billion years ago, and for about 1 billion years after, the Earth didnt even have an atmosphere, so helium couldn’t really be trapped at that time. Besides, rate change and exponential growth/decay styles only work in unvarying models, of which the Earth is not.

    4. Finally, the magnetic field has been present since at least 3,450 million years ago, not 4.5 billion years! This is just like the last one! And the fact that the magnetosphere and the magnetic fields are depleting doesn’t mean they’ve always been doing it. Again, just like the last one!

    You want to know what’s really funny, and still true? There is actually more proof of biological evolution than there is of Universal Gravitation! That is a fact!
    How about you use the computer for why it was invented: To get real answers!

    Will Davison
    February 12, 2012 at 23:14
    Reply

    • So with #1 in mind, is it not possible that how science measures time is flawed? Or, are you are saying fossil records and carbon dating is 100% accurate?

      Also do you realize the purpose of inventing evolution? That it really originated with Eramus Darwin, Charles’ Grandpa? Author of “Zoonomia, or the Laws of Organic Life.”?

      It’s proof evolution is fully based on the masonic occult belief of obtaining godhood.

      There’s evidence to support Eramus is the founder of the Masonic Lunar Society (1764-1800), later becoming the British Royal Society. The root of the origins of species was planned way before Charles Darwin.

      BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER, YOU DON’T CARE ABOUT THAT.

      “The Merchants of Light”… (Light=Lucifer), same “knowledge” that is the cause of man’s downfall. You been so caught up in proving something that is purposely deceitful. These guys were waaaay smarter than you. These Masons knew what they were doing to science instituted people like you.

      You keep fighting for something that has no evidence and what real experimental science would reject. But the institutes know this. So, we’ll never get a fair debate in our universities. Pure Scientism.

      Just like you, I have faith in what I believe. And just like you I may even only read what supports what I believe. Unlike you I am very reasonable and open minded to both sides of the story. But at least my faith is the most reason and has waaay more evidence.

      You’re so passionate about this stuff like you have evidence. FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR EVIDENCE HERE. If you used that same passion for just a week (and was open minded about the other side of the debate) you would see there’s reason for both sides of this scientific debate. And to be so stubborn to one side makes you not a true scientist at all.

      Lets look at spontaneous generation. (Which later was disproved by Biogenesis.)

      To bring about spontaneous generation would be to create a germ. It would be creating life; it would be to solve the problem of its origin. It would mean to go life through conditions of environment and of matter (lifeless material). God as author of life would then no longer be needed. Matter would replace Him. God would need to be invoked only as author of the motions of the universe.

      (That’s an actual quote from Louis Pasteur, DUBOS, p.395)

      Life CAN’T come from no life. Though, this should have put a stop to this ridiculous theory. The men/merchants/masons of “science” and even men (like you today) still push it.

      Even Dr. George Wald a Noble Prize Winning Evolutionist in the field of Biology and a Professor & Meritist of Biology at Harvard University said..

      There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility.

      end quote (unless you have a third?) back to quote..

      Spontaneous generation; that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of GOD. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which is scientifically impossible.

      (Wald, George, “Innovation and Biology,” Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100)

      But I’m assuming you’re sooo much smarter than this guy? Or, it’s safe to say be both have faith in or belief?

      EVOLUTION STILL HAS NO ANSWER FOR THE ORIGIN OF LIFE. The enterprise and you continues on blind faith. Your religion is based on “knowledge” created by the Merchants of Light AKA Lucifer worshipers.

      If you want to stick with your beliefs, that’s you. But if you’re a real scientist you would consider all experiments and even except flaws in your THEORY, instead of spending days and nights supporting you masonic religion. And you can fight with creationist all day, but you’re really just fighting with the ones that have recognized “scientific” deceit or the truth.

      I don’t want to offend you, but just as crazy as you think I am for believing in a God, you believe everything just happened and that consciousness evolved from crystals. And I’m the crazy one??? hah!

      I’m not trying to fight with you, you are not my enemy, you’re just a puppet of the enemy.

      For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

      - Ephesians 6:12

      It’s your choice not to believe in God or Jesus Christ. There were people, even during Jesus’ time that didn’t accept him and his teaching.

      Romans 1

      How about you stop running from the truth ad just accept it.

      Aw, you got me started. I haven’t even broken down you theories. You should subscribe to my blog, we can debate this until the end of our “meaningless lives”. You gotta at least want to know what the other side is say so you can find more ways to defend your belief. I appreciate the fact that you read my posts, even if your were mentally one sided while reading.

      Ex-New Ager
      February 13, 2012 at 10:17
      Reply

      • I love everything you just said, well, not really… I just loved the way you did it! Unlike the people I have to come into contact with who don’t grasp either side, you seem to have a good understanding of what your trying to prove! Good for u! I think I will subscribe, yes, but before I go I just want to make a few little points:

        1. You really can’t say that there’s no experimental evidence, because we have induced evolution in labs. In fact, dogs and corn are all the “experimental” evidence we need. (They weren’t actually made in labs, that was a different point)
        2. Abiogenesis and evolution are 2 completely different things: Abiogenesis=Origin of Life, Evolution=Cause of modern Life,,, I thought we were talking about evolution?
        3. Abiogenesis (not evolution) isn’t the belief that crystals turned into conciousness.

        These aren’t arguments, these are good subjects, though, to debate with. I’ll talk again, and don’t worry… I’m looking forward to it.

        “THINK ABOUT IT” -cdk007

        Will Davison
        February 18, 2012 at 04:14
        Reply

      • You know, I was looking forward to talking to you… and winning… but you haven’t done anything in over 10 days… Have I won already?

        Will Davison
        February 28, 2012 at 01:42
        Reply

  3. I love everything you just said, well, not really… I just loved the way you did it! Unlike the people I have to come into contact with who don’t grasp either side, you seem to have a good understanding of what your trying to prove! Good for u! I think I will subscribe, yes, but before I go I just want to make a few little points:

    1. You really can’t say that there’s no experimental evidence, because we have induced evolution in labs. In fact, dogs and corn are all the “experimental” evidence we need. (They weren’t actually made in labs, that was a different point)
    2. Abiogenesis and evolution are 2 completely different things: Abiogenesis=Origin of Life, Evolution=Cause of modern Life,,, I thought we were talking about evolution?
    3. Abiogenesis (not evolution) isn’t the belief that crystals turned into conciousness.

    These aren’t arguments, these are good subjects, though, to debate with. I’ll talk again, and don’t worry… I’m looking forward to it.

    “THINK ABOUT IT” -cdk007

    Will Davison
    February 15, 2012 at 02:05
    Reply

  4. I’m really not helping myself right now, but I’m new here, so… how do i ‘subscribe’?

    Will Davison
    February 16, 2012 at 03:42
    Reply

    • it’s ok, you’re a scientist, not a techy geek. to subscribe, you can hit the “rss” link at bottom, or “stay connected” in the top nav.

      sorry for putting all this theory into 1 bucket of jokes. I guess it is a bunch of different jokes.

      I’m telling you, you gotta read the In Six Days articles by the scientist that concluded that evolution isn’t the best theory. You’ll get all you sophisticated debates and rebuttals there.

      I’ll be honest, you’re not getting the super scientific debates out of me (Ex-New Ager). I’m already aware there’s more to life. I don’t need the “proof” or to defend my faith that’s based on a book with more evidence that any book I had to read in college.

      Here you can find the source of my evolution (and Jesus is Savior) articles – http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/evolution_the_big_hoax.htm or
      http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/recorded_history.htm

      Here you can read about real scientists who believe in creation – http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/isd

      And it’s OK to believe in God. it’s not too late :) The world wont kill you. They may tell you, you’re stupid. But that’s nothing compared to what they did to Jesus.

      Ex-New Ager
      March 10, 2012 at 09:47
      Reply

  5. Alright then, pleasure doing… i dont know, “business” with you. Thank you and apologies for any unnecessary revaling.

    Will Davison
    March 10, 2012 at 22:37
    Reply

  6. I believe in God, non-denominational. I use to be an ex-occultist, Gnostic theologian…I also consider myself a scientist, one who does not fall into the science religion.

    I kind of agree and disagree with both of you so maybe I can fill the gap…

    Scripture never really says evolution can’t exist or that things can’t change form over time. Scripture DOES tell us that GOD put a variety of species on the planet, along with creating the Human Race, which HE made in His image.

    I personally, due to my own study, have come to believe that our genetic structure shows evidence for intervention, and that humans have not evolved from early Homonids. It does not mean however that I don’t believe there is a potential for things to evolve and adapt to different settings. Evolution is something we have just observed happening in the material world, and if anything it should show us the magic and complexity of GOD when he planned the material world.

    Look what happened when the fallen angles bread with human females… they bread abominations such as the Nephilim and who knows what other giant monsters…

    Or in todays world… look at the example of the Silver siberian fox. They have been bread with other silver foxes in such a way (I believe it was breeding only the non-aggressive foxes?) where they eventually started to take on DNA attributes and characteristics dogs have. (Very pretty animals by the way)

    As a farmer, I use evolution to crossbreed so that they take on the characteristics of plants that live in colder weather so that they can survive in colder weather. this is NOT GMO by the way ( which I am against).

    Or look at the Mezoamerican culture, they were the ones who created Corn. Well, they were taught how to domesticate it by their “skygods” (fallen angels maybe) but still.

    This is my take from it:

    That we were created to be special, of His likeness. But we were put in a limited space known as the Material World, which God had intended for us to be a part of to learn a specific lesson(the Material world is like a school). that we were created by Him and to see what we really are through Him. And that we don’t belong here at all.

    We can choose to follow Satan, who believes we should become gods ourselves, to “make a name for ourselves”, put all of eggs in one basket so to speak, by manipulating the material world to try and reach Godhood…which the NWO wants; Eugenics, Eco-friendly Humans-are-bad Earth worship; control weather, population etc. SURVIVAL. What they don’t know is that trying to reach Godhood is pointless in the material world because of obvious reasons, and doing so will only lead to… well let’s put it this way, a way of live I want no part of.

    Evolution is a natural way of the material world, but we should not rely on understanding the knowledge of how it all works because we lose sight of the real important thing. Science has offered great things! but because the universe and God are so complex we can never grasp it, so it becomes an obsession and can throw us off in tangents if we are not careful about it.

    JC3xclusive
    July 14, 2012 at 23:44
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>